Custom drinkware purchase order requirements: PO attachments
A custom drinkware purchase order should connect the accepted quotation to the exact product, specification revision, quantity by colour, artwork, packaging and agreed acceptance checks. It should also name the people who can approve each item and the documents still awaiting approval. Treat the PO and its attachments as one order package: a total quantity and a product photo alone leave too much open.
A custom drinkware purchase order should connect the accepted quotation to the exact configuration being bought: model, capacity, component materials, lid and accessories, specification revision, quantity by colour and artwork version, packaging and agreed acceptance checks. Attach an index that lists each document with its revision, approval status and approver, and ask the supplier to check its order acknowledgement against that package. Reconcile colour and artwork lines with the PO total, and confirm minimums for the exact split rather than the overall quantity. Write acceptance checks as what will be checked, by which method, against which approved reference and by whom. BG Drinkware, a drinkware manufacturer in Yongkang, China, quotes a standard MOQ of 500 pieces, negotiable, with some models from 100 per colour. Samples of existing models take up to 7 days and bulk production 7–12 days after sample approval, so pending approvals in the package directly affect the dispatch date.
For a project with BG Drinkware, a drinkware manufacturer in Yongkang, China, use the checklist below to prepare that package after accepting a quotation. It is a buyer's working checklist, not a statement of standard contract terms. The aim is to let your purchasing team, designer and supplier identify the same approved configuration without searching an email thread. Keep unresolved items visible, and ask for written confirmation of how they affect the next step. A purchase order number should make the order easier to trace, not hide missing decisions.
What should you attach to the purchase order?
Attach an index that identifies the accepted quotation, product specification, quantity split, artwork, packaging and acceptance requirements. Give each attachment a revision or date and record its approval status. Ask the supplier to check the package against its order acknowledgement, so discrepancies can be resolved before the affected work proceeds.
For a wholesale drinkware project, organise the package by the configuration being purchased. A bottle body with one lid is a different order line from the same body with another lid or accessory set. A reference photo can help identify the shape, but it should not replace the written configuration.
| Document | What to identify | What to check against the PO |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted quotation | Quotation reference and revision | Accepted configuration, currency, unit price or line amount, payment terms, trade term and named place, and agreed dispatch milestone or date |
| Product specification | Model, capacity, materials by component, lid and included accessories | The same product on every order line |
| Quantity schedule | Units by model, capacity, body colour and artwork version | Line quantities reconcile with the order total |
| Artwork approval | File revision, decoration method, dimensions, placement and orientation | The approved artwork applies to the correct colour and product |
| Packaging specification | Individual pack, included parts, labels and carton marks | Each item receives the intended pack |
| Acceptance plan | Inspection points, agreed methods and acceptance criteria | Checks apply to the ordered configuration |
| Approval record | Decision, document revision, responsible person and date | Open items are distinct from approved items |
Swipe or scroll to view the full table.
Use an attachment register rather than a folder full of unexplained files. Record who is expected to approve an unfinished document. If the supplier's acknowledgement describes a different lid, colour allocation or packaging version, resolve that difference explicitly; neither team should guess which description controls production.
Copy the buyer worksheet below and complete one row for each attachment. Use the exact filename sent with the PO, and make pending approvals visible.
| File name | Revision/date | Status | Approver | Applicable order line(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Swipe or scroll to view the full table.
Which specification version will the supplier use?
Identify the current revision of every document that describes the product. Put those references in the PO attachment index and ask the supplier to confirm them. Where two files conflict, resolve the specific difference and issue a corrected package; a filename containing "final" does not explain what was approved.
Separate the product specification from the artwork file. The specification should identify the cup or bottle and its components. The artwork approval should identify the decoration to apply to that product. Review both together when a logo is positioned relative to a handle, seam, lid or other physical feature.
For decoration decisions, use the drinkware customisation options to discuss the selected method, then record the agreed result in the attachment. "Logo as discussed" leaves dimensions, position and orientation unrecorded. A screenshot of a logo is also different from the production artwork file.
Record a physical sample reference if one is part of the approval. State what it represents: colour, finish, assembly, decoration or the full configuration. Keep the detailed sample process in the sampling discussion; the PO package needs the applicable sample identity and any exceptions agreed in writing.
Keep superseded files for traceability, but mark them clearly and separate them from the current package. Do not overwrite an old approval with a new file under the same name. If the design team sends a revised logo after the PO, identify it as a proposed change until the affected requirements have been reconfirmed.
Do the quantity and colour schedules add up?
List quantities by model, capacity, body colour and decoration version, then reconcile those lines with the PO total. Add the packaging allocation where it differs. Ask the supplier to confirm any minimum quantities and carton constraints for that exact split; an accepted total does not explain how the units are divided.
Colour names need an agreed reference. "Blue" can describe a body colour, a lid colour or an ink colour. Give those separate fields where they differ, and identify the approved colour reference or sample rather than relying on the colour displayed on a screen.
Use the following checks before issuing the order package:
| Reconciliation | Question to resolve |
|---|---|
| Product lines to PO total | Does the sum of every model and capacity line equal the quantity ordered? |
| Colour allocations to product line | Are all units assigned to a specific approved body and lid colour combination? |
| Artwork allocations to units | Is each quantity assigned to the correct logo version or left explicitly blank? |
| Packed units to supplied units | Are gift boxes, accessories and labels allocated to the same quantities? |
| Shipment allocation to packed units | If there are multiple destinations, is every packed unit assigned once? |
Swipe or scroll to view the full table.
Do not infer that the same minimum applies to every model, capacity or colour. Likewise, do not add an assumed production overrun allowance. If a quantity variation is permitted, record the agreed scope and how it will be reported. If the project requires an exact quantity, raise that requirement for written confirmation.
Packaging also needs an identity. Two colours packed in the same plain box may share one packing instruction; two versions with different labels need a clear mapping. Check that the carton mark identifies the contents your receiving team actually needs to distinguish.
How should acceptance checks be written?
Describe what will be checked, under which agreed conditions, against which approved reference and by whom. Separate appearance, assembly, function and packaging requirements. A phrase such as "good quality" gives no common comparison point; a named specification and an agreed check give both parties something concrete to review.
Build the attachment around the risks of the chosen configuration. For a lid assembly, identify the lid, seal and any included straw or stopper. For a decorated surface, identify the approved artwork and finish reference. For packaging, specify the included parts, label content and packing arrangement.
Do not use a visual artwork proof as approval of leak performance, material grade or finished-product dimensions. Match each requirement to a suitable record or check. If the order requires a test, agree the method, conditions, scope and acceptance criterion rather than inserting an unsupported "pass" label.
Discuss the inspection scope through quality control and reference the resulting agreed plan in the PO package. State who receives the inspection result and who decides how a discrepancy will be handled. An inspection report, permission to pack and approval to ship are separate decisions if your project treats them that way.
Keep any unresolved criterion on the open-items list. It is better to show that a check still needs agreement than to imply that a vague description has become an accepted requirement.
Who can approve the product, artwork and shipment?
Name the person authorised to approve each decision and the supplier contact who will acknowledge it. Record the document revision, scope and date of approval. Distinguish a buyer's internal sign-off from the instruction acknowledged by the supplier, and make clear which unfinished approval prevents the affected work from proceeding.
One person may coordinate the whole order while different people approve brand artwork, product specifications or inspection results. Make that division visible. A designer's approval of logo placement should not silently authorise a different lid, quantity split or packing method.
Use explicit decision wording. "Artwork revision C approved for the listed product and colour allocation" identifies the scope better than "looks good." When approval is conditional, record the remaining condition and request confirmation of what work, if any, can proceed while it remains open. Do not assume that sending the PO settles those conditions.
Keep the approval record with the current document package. If a replacement approver takes over, update the contact record and confirm the handover. A copied email recipient is not automatically an authorised decision-maker.
A cover note for the PO attachment package
Use the cover note to identify the order package, list the current attachments and request acknowledgement of any differences. Keep it brief enough to read alongside the files. Its purpose is to make the supplier's response specific, not to introduce new specifications that appear nowhere else in the order documents.
Adapt the following wording to the project:
Please review the attached purchase order together with its attachment index. The index identifies the accepted quotation, current product specification, quantity and colour schedule, artwork, packaging instructions and acceptance plan. Please confirm that your order acknowledgement refers to the same revisions and identifies any difference or unresolved item.
Please also confirm the approval still required for the next stage, who will acknowledge it, and the work covered by that approval. Where an attachment is marked pending, please identify the affected work and confirm the agreed action before it proceeds.
Before sending, open the actual attachments from the outgoing message. Check that the filenames match the index, the quantities reconcile and the approval record points to those files. The final attachment check catches a practical problem that a complete-looking PO cannot: sending an earlier revision of the right document.
Purchase order questions
These questions concern the handover after quotation acceptance. Use the answers to check the document package and resolve missing decisions with the supplier. The required records depend on the product and agreed order; the checklist does not create a universal approval procedure or replace the terms accepted by both parties.
Can an accepted quotation replace the product specification?
A quotation can identify the commercial offer, but check whether it describes the full configuration being ordered. If it leaves the lid, accessories, decoration or packaging unclear, attach an agreed specification and reference it from the PO. Ask the supplier to acknowledge the same configuration rather than assuming a photograph fills the gaps.
Should the purchase order include the colour split?
Include it whenever the order contains more than one colour or combination. Identify quantities by the agreed body, lid and decoration references, then reconcile them with the order total. Ask for confirmation of the minimums and packing arrangement that apply to the split, even if the overall quantity has already been accepted.
What if the artwork or sample is still pending?
Mark it pending, name the approver and identify the affected work. Ask the supplier what can proceed under the current approval and what must wait. Keep the eventual approval linked to its exact revision or sample reference. Do not relabel a pending item as approved simply to make the package appear complete.
Does an artwork proof approve the entire product?
Only treat it as approval of the items it actually represents. A logo layout does not by itself confirm lid fit, supplied accessories, functional performance or packaging. Record those requirements separately and identify the appropriate specification, sample or check. Ask for clarification if an approval form combines decisions your team has reviewed separately.
What should happen when the acknowledgement differs from the PO?
List each difference and resolve it in writing before the affected work proceeds. Issue a corrected PO or attachment where needed, keeping the old revision identifiable. Ask for an updated acknowledgement that points to the agreed package. Leaving conflicting documents in circulation makes the next approval harder to interpret.
